External attack surface
Domains, subdomains, applications, public services, DNS and exposed configurations that can be observed or attacked from outside.
Security Assessment
Understand the attack surface Before you choose the remedy.
We evaluate the publicly exposed website, domain, email and services, validate findings and turn them into a technical plan prioritized by risk and impact.
Scope map
Four areas, the same context of risk.
Scope is tailored to the environment and objective of engagement. We do not add assets or testing techniques beyond authorization only to produce a longer report.
Web & infrastructure posture
TLS, security headers, exposed technologies, access paths, defensive configurations and known vulnerabilities relevant to the services in scope.
Identity & email posture
MFA and access controls where they can be evaluated, plus SPF, DKIM, DMARC and domain configurations that influence impersonation and account risk.
Risk & remediation
Findings are explained through impact and context, then transformed into a prioritized and verifiable remedy plan.
Methodology
From scope to verification, without mysterious steps.
Value comes from validation, context, and prioritizing findings around the actual service.
Define scope
We set assets, averages, authorization limits and what is not valued before any technical activity.
Discover
We build the exposure inventory and identify technologies, services and configurations that are worth looking into in depth.
Validate
We check the findings enough to avoid false positives and keep the testing within the limits set for engagement.
Prioritize
We correlate technical severity with exploitability, exposure and impact on the service or data.
Report
We document the finding, relevant evidence, impact and recommended actions in a format that can be used by the technical team.
Remediate & verify
If it goes into scope, we help remedy and check if the change has closed the cause, not just the symptom.
Finding anatomy
A find must be able to be used.
Finding must provide enough context for the technical owner to understand the problem, decide the order, and be able to verify the remedy.
FINDING-07 / DEMO PRIORITIZED
01Finding
What we have identified and where the problem arises.
02Evidence
The minimum technical information necessary to understand or reproduce the finding safely.
03Risk
What can the problem enable and what is the actual context of exploitation or impact.
04Priority
The recommended order of remedy in relation to the other findings and addictions.
05Remediation
What needs to be changed and what compromises or checks may be needed before implementation.
06Verification
How we confirm that the remedy solved the cause without breaking the legitimate functionality.
Deliverables
The report should reduce uncertainty.
We separate the immediate risk from the recommended hardening and indicate what needs to be checked after the change so that the report can be turned into execution.
- 01 scope and inventory of the analyzed surface
- 02 Technical findings prioritized by risk and context
- 03 sufficient evidence for understanding and remediation
- 04 Technical recommendations and next steps
- 05 separarea problemelor urgente de hardening-ul recomandat
- 06 mapping to controls or compliance requirements where relevant
- 07 Review of results with technical owners
Rules of engagement
Assessment limits are part of security.
A good assessment is explicit about what it can test, how far it validates and what assets remain outside of authorization.
Authorization first
We do not extend testing to other systems, tenants or suppliers just because they appear as dependencies.
Assessment ≠ pentest implicit
A security assessment does not automatically become a penetration test. Active testing, exploitation and other intrusive techniques require an appropriate scope and rules for engagement.
Minimizing the impact
Validation must provide sufficient confidence without causing unavailability, data loss or unnecessary changes in production.
Secrets do not enter the public form
Passwords, private keys, recovery codes and tokens should not be sent through the public form. Required access is established through the appropriate channel after the engagement is defined.
Handoff
After the assessment, you choose who to execute.
The report does not block you in a single pattern. You can fix it internally, with existing providers or with ZebraByte where it makes sense.
01
Website Security
WAF, hardening, malware monitoring, DDoS protection and recovery for publicly exposed applications.
02Email Security
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, identity hardening and remediation for email and domain posture.
03Secure Managed Hosting
Migration and operation continues when the infrastructure itself has to be brought into a managed security model.
04Incident Response
Triage and containment when the assessment starts from a suspicion of compromise or an active incident.
Customer reviews
What customers say
Real feedback about security, managed hosting, support and projects delivered by ZebraByte.
I had the site full of viruses and it gave me mistakes all the time. It didn’t work properly anymore and nobody knew what it had. Those at ZebraByte helped me immediately cleaned everything, secured the site and moved it to their servers. Since then it’s gone perfectly and I haven’t had any problems anymore. It’s seen that I know what I’m doing and even getting involved. I recommend 100%! I started working withZebrabytefor a few months and they delivered more than I expected. I decided to move my site to them because I had problems with the old provider and it was also viral. Those at ZebraByte have very high standards in terms of security and enterprise hosting. Their team is very professional, responds quickly to any questions, offers clear solutions and explains the meaning of everyone even if you don’t have technical knowledge. Hosting platforms are stable, fast and well protected. I had a bad problem with the site, I still got security alerts and weird links appeared everywhere. Those at ZebraByte immediately entered, cleaned everything and moved it to them. Since then it goes smoothly, even faster. Very serious! Super professional! We worked very well with this team. All requirements were solved in a very short time. I have worked great with this team. Very good team! Best cooperation i have ever seen. 10 stars!!! Excellent service, very understanding and patient with all our requests. I fully recommend ZebraByte for website designs to suit your needs! Frequently asked questions
Security Assessment este un penetration test? +
Not by default. The Assessment analyzes the exposed surface, configurations and controls within the scope. A penetration test has separate testing and authorization rules and should be agreed separately when necessary.
Do you need administrative access? +
We can start from an external perspective and extend the review to internal configurations only if the scope requires it and access is provided through an appropriate channel.
Do you also review third-party suppliers? +
We can document dependence and associated risk, but we do not test third-party infrastructure without proper authorization.
What happens after the report? +
You can fix with the existing team or provider, or ZebraByte can take certain hardening, website/email security, migration or managed security actions if they fall within scope.
Can the assessment also help with ISO27001, NIS2 or GDPR? +
Yes, technical findings and evidence can support relevant risk treatment or controls, but the Assessment does not certify the organization and does not replace the applicable compliance program or legal analysis.
Let’s start with the correct scope, not a list of tools.
Tell us what you want us to evaluate and what the business context is.We set engagement limits before any testing.
Talk about assessment