NIS2 readiness and governance
We help inventory risks, measures, suppliers, incidents and technical evidence relevant to applicable requirements, without presenting technology as a substitute for legal or institutional analysis.
Cyber security, NIS2 and accessibility for public institutions
A joint program for exposed public services, email, infrastructure, NIS2 readiness, GDPR and digital accessibility.
Context
Security should reflect how the organization works.
Public institutions operate visible services, manage personal data and must be able to demonstrate governance, technical measures and responsiveness.
Public institutions have visible services, institutional identities, personal data, suppliers and governance obligations. Cyber resilience, NIS2 readiness, GDPR and digital accessibility must be coordinated, not treated as isolated projects.
The Priorities: NIS2 · Public services · GDPR · Accessibility · Incident readiness
Risk area in public institutions
The context of the sector helps us to separate the relevant exposure from the controls that just look good in a checklist.
01
Attacks on public websites and services
02
Compromise institutional email accounts
03
Lack of visibility on vulnerabilities and providers
04
Incident trials and insufficiently prepared evidence
What should be protected as a priority
The focus is built around sector-specific operations, data and dependencies, not by renaming a generic package.
Servicii publice expuse
Public websites and applications protected by WAF, DDoS protection, hardening, vulnerability management and recovery procedures tailored to service criticism.
Email and institutional identity
DMARC, DKIM, SPF, MFA and privileged account controls reduce impersonation, phishing and unauthorized access to official communication channels.
The digital accessibility
We audit and improve the experience in accordance with applicable accessibility requirements and WCAG principles, integrating accessibility into the normal operating cycle of digital services.
Security and compliance linked to the same risk
We can combine assessment, controls, evidence, application security and email identity only where they reduce risk or support the real requirements of the organization.
Compliance
Managed Compliance
Risk, controls, evidence and audit readiness managed in a continuous program.
Cyber Security
Cyber security
Assessment, hardening, identity, monitoring and incident readiness tailored to how the organization works every day.
Email & Domain Security
Email security
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, anti-spoofing and phishing/BEC protection for the digital identity of the organization.
Website Security
Security website
WAF, DDoS protection, malware scanning, hardening and recovery for public applications and websites.
Program integrat
Multiple suppliers need a common picture of risk
An institution may have separate hosting, development, email, applications and support. The problem arises when no one tracks dependencies, access, vulnerabilities, responsibilities and incident response.
01
Common inventory of assets, suppliers and liabilities
02
Security assessment and remediation tracking before declarations of conformity
03
Incident readiness and evidence kept continuously
04
Accessibility, privacy and cyber security integrated into the same digital governance
Rezultate
What remains after the project?
We do not just pursue the delivery of documents. The goal is a clearer technical and operational posture that can beined, verified and demonstrated.
01
Technical Baseline and Governance Connected to NIS2 readiness
02
Protection of email, website and infrastructure
03
Incident response and evidence prepared before the incident
04
WCAG/accessibility integrated into the digital program
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions for Public Institutions
Can ZebraByte guarantee the compliance of an institution with NIS2?
We do not present a technical service as a legal guarantee. We can support NIS2 readiness through assessment, risk management, technical measures, evidence, supplier visibility and incident readiness, and applicable legal requirements must be validated in the context of the institution.
Can we work beyond existing contracts and suppliers?
Yes. The model can be an evaluation and coordination of controls, without automatic replacement of suppliers. Important is to have ownership, risk visibility and a verifiable remedy process.
How is accessibility linked to the security program?
They are separate disciplines, but both are part of the quality and governance of a digital public service. We can operate them in the same inventory, testing, repair and evidence program, keeping the specific requirements of each discipline.
What is a realistic starting point for an institution?
An assessment of exposed services, domains, email, privileged accounts, providers and current incident process. The result should be a prioritized backlog, not just a list of vulnerabilities.
Security and compliance in one program.
We can start with a punctual assessment, without the obligation to change existing suppliers, then we implement and operate only the measures required by scope.
Talk about public institutions